Power & systems

Barclays: 5,000 jobs cut because of AI?

How much of those 5,000 jobs is really down to AI?

6 min read
Barclays: 5,000 jobs cut because of AI?

Thursday: 5,000 roles and one word

On Thursday 22 October, Barclays presented its third-quarter results. Profit before tax came in at £2.3 billion, up 12% on the year. A new £500 million buyback brought the total returned to shareholders since January to £2.8 billion. And tucked into the analyst-call speech: an expected reduction of circa 5,000 full-time employees, about 5% of the workforce.

The Guardian led on the productivity gains from AI that executives were celebrating. The Unite union accused the bank of using AI as an "excuse" to get rid of loyal staff. Within a day, the story was set: AI is cutting 5,000 jobs at a major British bank.

We opened the documents Barclays published that same day. The story in them is narrower.

The sentence behind the headlines

It comes from Anna Cross, the chief financial officer, and it sits in the official speech the bank put online. "These actions involve an expected reduction of circa 5,000 full-time employees. Around 60% of the Group actions relate to support functions, including fewer developers as AI makes our people more productive."

Read slowly, that sentence has three layers. The 5,000 roles. The 60% of actions that hit support functions. And inside that subset, developers, the only group for which AI is invoked. It's a matryoshka doll, and the headlines kept the biggest figure while giving it the face of the smallest.

A footnote narrows it further: the 60% is calculated on second-half measures only. How many developers? The document doesn't say.

Another footnote sets the scope of the 5,000: all restructuring actions for the 2026 financial year, first-half measures included, subject to collective and individual consultations. The number is new. In July, the bank had flagged up to £500 million of extra restructuring charges for the second half, but in pounds, with no headcount attached. That sum has now been given a face.

What the other pages say

The results release doesn't use the word. It describes "technology-enabled" full-time employee reductions. The slide that goes with Cross's sentence lumps the expected gains under a single line: organisational simplification, technology change and AI-driven efficiency, in one bullet, with no figure to tell them apart.

CEO C. S. Venkatakrishnan gave his own take in the same speech. The bank will deploy AI at scale, but "AI is the icing on the cake, not the cake." The cake, as he sees it, is data standardisation, infrastructure modernisation and process harmonisation.

In front of journalists, according to the Guardian, he was asked how many of the cuts were directly tied to AI. He answered with technology investment and process simplification, which he said account for the bulk of the efficiency gains so far, again according to the Guardian. AI has an important role, perhaps a bigger one later. No number.

So it isn't really two executives contradicting each other. It's one sentence about developers, read as a sentence about 5,000 people.

Haven't we seen this before?

Barclays has announced this round number before. In January 2024, the bank confirmed it had cut approximately 5,000 headcount globally through 2023, from a workforce of roughly 84,000 according to City AM. A spokesperson's statement, quoted identically by City AM and LBC, placed most of the exits in support functions and in Barclays UK operations, "as management layers are reduced and the group improves its technology and automation capabilities."

Same order of magnitude, same support functions, same technology explanation. The difference is vocabulary: in 2023, the word "AI" appeared nowhere. ChatGPT had already been out for over a year.

It's a bit like repainting the same car for the next motor show. The colour changes, but the engine under the hood is still the cost-cutting plan.

What AI actually does at Barclays

It would be a mistake to conclude that AI counts for nothing. The plan is new in scale: the engine has a bigger displacement. In each of the previous two years, the bank delivered about £0.7 billion of gross savings, and that was still its assumption in February. It now expects more than £1.1 billion in 2027, after speeding up restructuring this year.

At Barclays UK, Cross also describes concrete effects. Over a year, calls to customer contact centres fell 10%, thanks to tools offered to customers. Staff per branch dropped by about 10%. According to the Guardian, 1,000 of the 5,000 roles have already gone since January.

But no document says what share of the 5,000 is due to AI, and the person best placed to say, when asked, didn't. The results release, the slide, the speech and the press Q&A: four chances, zero figures.

Why the word made it into the sentence

The open question is why AI appears in the 2026 announcement and not in the 2023 one. Here's one hypothesis, and we're not putting it in the bank's mouth. The backdrop: rising profits, and six days before a budget in which, according to the Guardian, the UK government is expected to raise taxes on banks. Against that background, "AI makes our people more productive" lands better than "we're cutting costs."

Barclays isn't alone in telling this story. A few months earlier, the Guardian recalls, Standard Chartered announced more than 7,000 job cuts over four years as it accelerates on AI, around 15% of its back-office roles by 2030. A Gartner survey of 2,002 CIOs, reported by The Decoder, found that 58% are expected to deliver savings from AI, and only 13% of respondents see major or transformative returns. AI is being asked to pay back a spend before it has paid off.

We've noted this pattern before: the people who announce the end of jobs are often selling the tools meant to cause it. At Anthropic, the in-house report on employment chose its own unit of measure. At Barclays, they chose their word.

The union calls it an excuse without demonstrating it; the bank calls it productivity without quantifying it. Unite wants employers to train staff so they can stay in post as technology changes the work, rather than letting them go. First you'd have to know which technology, and which roles it really changes.

The boss of Barclays did give the only measure on offer, and it comes from the bakery. If AI is just the icing, it's still the icing that got put in the shop window.

Was this article useful?

Topics covered:

EconomyAnalysis

Frequently asked questions

How many jobs is Barclays cutting?
When it presented third-quarter results on 22 October 2026, Barclays said in its analyst-call speech to expect a reduction of circa 5,000 full-time employees, about 5% of its workforce. A footnote says the figure covers all restructuring actions for the 2026 financial year, first-half measures included, and is subject to collective and individual consultations. According to the Guardian, 1,000 of those roles have already gone since January.
Does Barclays attribute those 5,000 job cuts to AI?
Not as a block. In the analyst-call speech, CFO Anna Cross says around 60% of the Group's actions relate to support functions, "including fewer developers as AI makes our people more productive." AI is invoked only for developers, and a footnote says the 60% is calculated on second-half measures alone. The results release speaks of "technology-enabled" reductions in full-time employees. No document says what share of the 5,000 is due to AI.
What does Barclays' CEO say about AI's role?
In the same speech, C. S. Venkatakrishnan says the bank will use AI at scale, but "AI is the icing on the cake, not the cake." The cake, in his telling, is data standardisation, infrastructure modernisation and process harmonisation. Asked by journalists how many cuts were directly linked to AI, he pointed instead to technology investment and process simplification, according to the Guardian, and gave no figure.
Had Barclays already cut 5,000 jobs before the AI pitch?
Yes. In January 2024 the bank confirmed it had cut approximately 5,000 headcount globally through 2023, according to a spokesperson statement quoted identically by City AM and LBC. The exits were mostly in support functions and in Barclays UK operations, as management layers were reduced and the group improved its technology and automation capabilities. The statement didn't mention AI.
Are companies already getting returns from AI?
A Gartner survey of 2,002 CIOs, reported by The Decoder, found that 58% are expected to deliver savings from AI, and that only 13% of respondents see major or transformative returns. At Barclays UK, the CFO points to concrete effects: 10% fewer calls to customer contact centres and roughly 10% fewer staff per branch over a year.
Julien-Pierre Noto

Julien-Pierre Noto

Entrepreneur & Voice from the Field

Julien-Pierre is an entrepreneur with over twenty years of hands-on experience in construction and real estate. For the past three years, he has been working with AI every day in an SME — not in a lab: on real cases, with real clients. Founder of ONDE AI R&D, an applied research lab on human-AI work, he publishes his methods as open source — what works and what doesn't. At Declic Media, he is the voice from the field: applied AI, the kind that has to prove its worth.

All articles by Julien-Pierre →
The free AI newsletter